title: illegal drugs
content
1-What do you think the world would improve under this
system of legalized drugs?
2-In your opinion, what legalization would negatively
affect the world?
3-What do you think is the role of the state?
4.-Because countries do not agree to radical drug problem?
What do you think the world would improve under this
system of legalized drugs?
The current system of drug prohibition. Does more harm than good.
The current system of drug prohibition. Does more harm than good.
There would be fewer people in jail morally innocent, while these people may be respected and socially accepted either seeking employment or dignity. Reduction of homicides. People consumerist drugs do not become criminals to get drugs, being able to get guarantees and quality.
Under prohibition of alcohol, alcohol poisoning deaths,
by things that are mixed with alcohol smuggling, increased sharply. Similarly,
under drug prohibition has increased overdose deaths, for Adulteration or
adulterated substances.
Moreover, the money badly spent trying to combat illegal drugs is lost. Better investment of this money would be more profitable investment in education, housing, health and other commitments it has states with the population. Not to mention the taxes that raise the leaving of a trade, so active in the world.
Moreover, the money badly spent trying to combat illegal drugs is lost. Better investment of this money would be more profitable investment in education, housing, health and other commitments it has states with the population. Not to mention the taxes that raise the leaving of a trade, so active in the world.
In your opinion, what legalization would negatively
affect the world?
The main side effect that could have legalized it would quite possibly have more people taking drugs. Although this is not obvious in any way. Well, if legalized, would destroy the black market and the price would drop drastically. And as an economist, I know that lower prices tend to generate more demand. However this must be taken with great caution.
The main side effect that could have legalized it would quite possibly have more people taking drugs. Although this is not obvious in any way. Well, if legalized, would destroy the black market and the price would drop drastically. And as an economist, I know that lower prices tend to generate more demand. However this must be taken with great caution.
What do you think is the role of the state?
The state's role is exactly what John Stuart Mill said in the nineteenth century in "On Liberty". The proper role of government is to prevent other people from harming a person. The government, he said, never has any right to interfere in the life of a person for the sake of that person. the government instead of protecting people, which is generating criminal damage to others. We have dead people in the various wars of the drug. We have corruption in the legal environment. We have innocent victims are the taxpayers who have to pay for more and more prisons and more and more inmates, and more and more police. We have the rest of us who do not have a decent implementation of the law because all agents are busy trying to do the impossible.
The people of Colombia, Mexico, Peru and other countries. Why can not implement its our own laws? If they could apply their own laws against drugs, there would be no market for these substances. Colombia would not be as it is.
Because countries do not agree to radical drug problem?
The state's role is exactly what John Stuart Mill said in the nineteenth century in "On Liberty". The proper role of government is to prevent other people from harming a person. The government, he said, never has any right to interfere in the life of a person for the sake of that person. the government instead of protecting people, which is generating criminal damage to others. We have dead people in the various wars of the drug. We have corruption in the legal environment. We have innocent victims are the taxpayers who have to pay for more and more prisons and more and more inmates, and more and more police. We have the rest of us who do not have a decent implementation of the law because all agents are busy trying to do the impossible.
The people of Colombia, Mexico, Peru and other countries. Why can not implement its our own laws? If they could apply their own laws against drugs, there would be no market for these substances. Colombia would not be as it is.
Because countries do not agree to radical drug problem?
Because there are economic interests intermediate, which
hinder a radical solution to illegal drugs.
The main business United States is selling weapons to the war: In Mexico, the war against drug trafficking which is lost (due to their lack of experience in combating drug trafficking). The United States plays a dual role as a party to an alleged cooperation with the Mexican government provisioned with obsolete weapons of World War II. On the other hand sells weapons to narco traffickers Aztecs.
The main business United States is selling weapons to the war: In Mexico, the war against drug trafficking which is lost (due to their lack of experience in combating drug trafficking). The United States plays a dual role as a party to an alleged cooperation with the Mexican government provisioned with obsolete weapons of World War II. On the other hand sells weapons to narco traffickers Aztecs.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario